<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Design For Print Check List</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.graphicdesignblog.co.uk/design-for-print-check-list/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.graphicdesignblog.co.uk/design-for-print-check-list/</link>
	<description>Graphic Design Tutorials, Graphic design news and information by a freelance graphic designer in Northamptonshire UK</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:52:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: BlueFlameDesign</title>
		<link>http://www.graphicdesignblog.co.uk/design-for-print-check-list/comment-page-1/#comment-25344</link>
		<dc:creator>BlueFlameDesign</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jun 2010 06:10:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.graphicdesignblog.co.uk/design-for-print-check-list/#comment-25344</guid>
		<description>Looking at the post I can see that this is quite old but still very, very relevant.

It&#039;s good to know that there are still some meticulous and conscientious designers out there who still take pride in their work and print results!

I will certainly keep this post bookmarked as a reference source to others.

One point I would like to contribute - if people still struggle with getting their artwork prepped for print then they should visit the &lt;a href=&#039;http://www.ppa.co.uk/all-about-magazines/production/pass4press/&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Pass4press&lt;/a&gt; website and install the relevant plug-in. Printers seem to use their presets as standard nowadays and it really does save a lot of hassle ... 
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looking at the post I can see that this is quite old but still very, very relevant.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s good to know that there are still some meticulous and conscientious designers out there who still take pride in their work and print results!</p>
<p>I will certainly keep this post bookmarked as a reference source to others.</p>
<p>One point I would like to contribute &#8211; if people still struggle with getting their artwork prepped for print then they should visit the <a href='http://www.ppa.co.uk/all-about-magazines/production/pass4press/'>Pass4press</a> website and install the relevant plug-in. Printers seem to use their presets as standard nowadays and it really does save a lot of hassle &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Web Designer</title>
		<link>http://www.graphicdesignblog.co.uk/design-for-print-check-list/comment-page-1/#comment-4128</link>
		<dc:creator>Web Designer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2008 12:07:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.graphicdesignblog.co.uk/design-for-print-check-list/#comment-4128</guid>
		<description>Some helpful tips here! Cheers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some helpful tips here! Cheers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Houses online</title>
		<link>http://www.graphicdesignblog.co.uk/design-for-print-check-list/comment-page-1/#comment-3275</link>
		<dc:creator>Houses online</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 13:42:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.graphicdesignblog.co.uk/design-for-print-check-list/#comment-3275</guid>
		<description>Actual tips and i use most of them but forget some.((</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actual tips and i use most of them but forget some.((</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tara: Freelance Designer</title>
		<link>http://www.graphicdesignblog.co.uk/design-for-print-check-list/comment-page-1/#comment-2172</link>
		<dc:creator>Tara: Freelance Designer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Aug 2007 19:34:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.graphicdesignblog.co.uk/design-for-print-check-list/#comment-2172</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your comment Satish.

Hi Johno, I don&#039;t know InDesign well enough to do a comparison :) , I have only used it a couple of times but didn&#039;t like the way you could see the edge of the image that was not within the picture box, I just found it confusing. I don&#039;t like illustrator for this either. Maybe you could do a comparison I would live to hear the pros and cons of each? That&#039;s if you are not too busy with the typography blog (thanks for the link by the way). :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your comment Satish.</p>
<p>Hi Johno, I don&#8217;t know InDesign well enough to do a comparison <img src='http://gdesignblog.gdesignblog.netdna-cdn.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  , I have only used it a couple of times but didn&#8217;t like the way you could see the edge of the image that was not within the picture box, I just found it confusing. I don&#8217;t like illustrator for this either. Maybe you could do a comparison I would live to hear the pros and cons of each? That&#8217;s if you are not too busy with the typography blog (thanks for the link by the way). <img src='http://gdesignblog.gdesignblog.netdna-cdn.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: johno</title>
		<link>http://www.graphicdesignblog.co.uk/design-for-print-check-list/comment-page-1/#comment-2171</link>
		<dc:creator>johno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Aug 2007 18:53:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.graphicdesignblog.co.uk/design-for-print-check-list/#comment-2171</guid>
		<description>Great post. I only wish I&#039;d read this a decade ago; would have saved me learning the hard way--printers can be very undiplomatic.
The outlines for illustrator fonts is a good tip.

Tara, I&#039;m interested to know what it is about InDesign&#039;s image handling that you don&#039;t like. I use InDesign CS3, and I love it&#039;s image handling, the ease of re-linking single and multiple image links, etc.

Time for a Quark vs InDesign post, Tara (please) :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post. I only wish I&#8217;d read this a decade ago; would have saved me learning the hard way&#8211;printers can be very undiplomatic.<br />
The outlines for illustrator fonts is a good tip.</p>
<p>Tara, I&#8217;m interested to know what it is about InDesign&#8217;s image handling that you don&#8217;t like. I use InDesign CS3, and I love it&#8217;s image handling, the ease of re-linking single and multiple image links, etc.</p>
<p>Time for a Quark vs InDesign post, Tara (please) <img src='http://gdesignblog.gdesignblog.netdna-cdn.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Satish</title>
		<link>http://www.graphicdesignblog.co.uk/design-for-print-check-list/comment-page-1/#comment-2166</link>
		<dc:creator>Satish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2007 05:31:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.graphicdesignblog.co.uk/design-for-print-check-list/#comment-2166</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the checklist!  I find often that printers are always throwing out their own random asks, and maybe with this type of consolidated list I can ensure we do all we can so the printer can just get the thing out the door.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the checklist!  I find often that printers are always throwing out their own random asks, and maybe with this type of consolidated list I can ensure we do all we can so the printer can just get the thing out the door.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tara: Freelance Designer</title>
		<link>http://www.graphicdesignblog.co.uk/design-for-print-check-list/comment-page-1/#comment-2164</link>
		<dc:creator>Tara: Freelance Designer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 20:25:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.graphicdesignblog.co.uk/design-for-print-check-list/#comment-2164</guid>
		<description>Thomas  - To be honest I have never really heard of output profiles I leave everything on defaults. I have never had any problem in 15 years but you will have to advise me more on this one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thomas  &#8211; To be honest I have never really heard of output profiles I leave everything on defaults. I have never had any problem in 15 years but you will have to advise me more on this one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Fjordside</title>
		<link>http://www.graphicdesignblog.co.uk/design-for-print-check-list/comment-page-1/#comment-2163</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Fjordside</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 20:19:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.graphicdesignblog.co.uk/design-for-print-check-list/#comment-2163</guid>
		<description>Great checklist. I also check that my output profile match the one the printer has specified. Which is normally euroscale v2 coated here at least. I rarely find that in checklists but isn&#039;t that something you do?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great checklist. I also check that my output profile match the one the printer has specified. Which is normally euroscale v2 coated here at least. I rarely find that in checklists but isn&#8217;t that something you do?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake Zigler</title>
		<link>http://www.graphicdesignblog.co.uk/design-for-print-check-list/comment-page-1/#comment-2162</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake Zigler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 17:40:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.graphicdesignblog.co.uk/design-for-print-check-list/#comment-2162</guid>
		<description>Sounds great, I&#039;m going to test it out right now on the copier  here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds great, I&#8217;m going to test it out right now on the copier  here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tara: Freelance Designer</title>
		<link>http://www.graphicdesignblog.co.uk/design-for-print-check-list/comment-page-1/#comment-2161</link>
		<dc:creator>Tara: Freelance Designer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 17:38:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.graphicdesignblog.co.uk/design-for-print-check-list/#comment-2161</guid>
		<description>No problem Jake. Adding another colour gives the black a bit more density over a large area. Like I mentioned to Lauren-

You can test it with an inkjet/colour laser - create 2 squares of black, then colour one normal process black and the other a special black (100% black and 50% cyan) when you print it out the one with cyan in should look much denser and have a bit of a shine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No problem Jake. Adding another colour gives the black a bit more density over a large area. Like I mentioned to Lauren-</p>
<p>You can test it with an inkjet/colour laser &#8211; create 2 squares of black, then colour one normal process black and the other a special black (100% black and 50% cyan) when you print it out the one with cyan in should look much denser and have a bit of a shine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Database Caching 7/25 queries in 0.014 seconds using disk
Content Delivery Network via gdesignblog.gdesignblog.netdna-cdn.com

Served from: www.graphicdesignblog.co.uk @ 2012-02-10 11:02:16 -->
